PERSPECTIVE · MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL
With the 2026 World Series over, Major League Baseball and owners must find a common ground. Why a labor agreement matters for baseball’s future and the fans who obviously fuel it.
Share this story
Add The Nats Report as YOUR Preferred Nationals Source on Google
The Milwaukee Brewers have won their first World Series championship, defeating the Tampa Bay Rays in five games.
The celebration belongs to Milwaukee. But baseball’s next challenge belongs to everyone who cares about the game. Major League Baseball owners plan to lock out the players if the sides can’t agree on a new collective bargaining agreement by the expiration of the current deal, at 11:59 p.m. ET on Dec. 1. which at this point it feels like a virtual guarantee, as reports suggest that they will still be miles apart at that point.
Players and owners face a different kind of pressure: reaching an agreement that protects baseball’s future.
Both sides will talk about what is best for baseball. Both will invoke the fans. But who will make sure those fans are more than a talking point?
October should leave people thinking about next season not wondering whether an off-field dispute will overshadow it.
After a year that began with the excitement of the World Baseball Classic and ended with Milwaukee’s championship celebration, baseball has something worth building on.
The challenge now is to turn that attention into a reason to move forward together.
The World Baseball Classic helped set the tone early in the year, giving fans an opportunity to connect with the game through national pride, international competition and the chance to watch some of baseball’s biggest names represent their countries.
The television audiences reflected that interest.
Venezuela’s 3–2 victory over Team USA in the championship game averaged 10.784 million viewers across FOX and Fox Deportes, making it the most-watched World Baseball Classic telecast ever, according to MLB.com.
Across FOX, FS1 and FS2, tournament games averaged 1.294 million viewers a 156% increase over 2023.That interest extended beyond the United States.
Netflix’s World Baseball Classic coverage reached 31.4 million viewers in Japan across the tournament, according to Sports Video Group.
Those are reach figures rather than average audiences, so they should not be directly compared with the U.S. television averages.
They nevertheless add an important international dimension to the tournament’s success.The Classic offered a reminder of how many different ways people connect with baseball.
For some, it is a hometown team. For others, it is the opportunity to see their country compete on an international stage.
That is a relationship worth nurturing after the tournament ends not treating as a temporary burst of attention.
The interest continued into the summer
The World Baseball Classic was not the year’s only encouraging audience story.
The Mid-Summer Classic aka MLB’s All-Star Game averaged 8.79 million viewers across FOX and Fox Deportes, a 21% increase over 2025, according to Sports Media Watch. FOX’s English-language broadcast drew its largest audience for the event since 2018.
For perspective, baseball’s midsummer showcase attracted an audience roughly equal to the NBA All-Star Game, which drew approximately 8.8 million viewers across NBC, Telemundo and Peacock its strongest showing since 2011. That is not a perfect comparison.
The events appeared on different combinations of television and streaming platforms, and the reported figures use different measurement methods. Still, the totals provide useful context for the audience baseball attracted to its summer showcase.Not every event moved in the same direction.
MLB’s Home Run Derby averaged 5.3 million viewers in its Netflix debut, down 8% from the previous year on ESPN. That decline deserves acknowledgment alongside the All-Star Game’s growth.
A successful year does not mean every number increased or every decision worked. It means there were meaningful signs of interest and opportunities to understand what brought people in and what might keep them watching.The Derby’s decline is also a reason not to take audience loyalty for granted.
Encouraging results should create an incentive to improve, not an assumption that viewers will always follow.

The Brewers-Rays World Series did not have New York or Los Angeles on the marquee, but viewers still tuned in. According to Sports Business Journal, the first two games averaged approximately 11.6 million viewers across FOX, Fox Deportes and Univision.
That was roughly 30% above the comparable Rangers-Diamondbacks figure in 2023 and about 3% ahead of Astros-Phillies in 2022, although changes in Nielsen’s measurement methodology account for some of the increase.
Those figures cover the opening two games, not the completed Series. They should not be presented as the final audience for the championship.Even with that limitation, they offer an encouraging takeaway: a World Series without the biggest-market clubs still attracted a substantial national audience.
The financial stakes were considerable, too. Before the Series ended, Guggenheim analyst Michael Morris estimated that FOX would generate approximately $275 million in MLB postseason advertising revenue with a five-game World Series, according to Sports Business Journal.
That was a projection, not a final revenue total. It also does not tell us what a fair labor agreement should contain. Advertising estimates cannot settle the differences between players and owners.What they illustrate is the commercial value built around people choosing to watch baseball.
From the World Baseball Classic through the summer and into October, fans repeatedly made time for the sport’s biggest moments. Not every event grew, and the measurement caveats matter, but the year supplied plenty of reasons to look ahead with optimism.
The audience behind those numbers deserves to be treated as more than a revenue source.
“Today he looked good,” Bazzell told MLB.com. “I think he looks pretty good every single time.”
Now comes the battle over how the negotiations are presented to the public. Some fans have already picked a side. Others want to understand the disagreements before deciding where they stand.
Plenty simply want to know whether players and owners can reach a deal without disrupting the game they love.
This column is not an attempt to settle every disagreement between the two sides. It is about the people whose interests should not get lost in those disagreements.
Players should make their case. Owners should make theirs. Both should explain why their positions would help create a healthy future for the game.
Neither side should expect the words “for the fans” to substitute for that explanation.
It is easy to invoke fans when seeking public support. The more meaningful test is whether their interests remain part of the discussion when difficult choices have to be made.Fans do not have a seat at the negotiating table.
What they can decide is how much of their money, time and attention they are willing to keep giving baseball.That should matter throughout these negotiations not just when either side needs a sympathetic audience.And concern for fans should mean more than concern about whether they will keep spending. Their attachment to baseball includes family traditions, friendships and the routines that make a season part of everyday life.Those connections deserve consideration in their own right.
A deal matters but so do its terms.
An agreement does not require pretending the differences between players and owners are minor. It requires treating those differences as problems to solve rather than reasons to put the sport’s relationship with its audience at risk.
Calling for a deal is not the same as asking either side to accept any deal. The terms matter.
So does the willingness to work toward a resolution. Neither side owes fans an agreement at any cost.
Both owe them serious negotiations, clear explanations of their positions and a commitment to exhausting the opportunities for compromise before allowing a dispute to disrupt the season.
That is a different standard from demanding that someone simply give in.It recognizes that players and owners have interests to defend while also acknowledging that the consequences of a dispute would reach beyond the negotiating room.
Fans should not be expected to treat uncertainty as part of the price of loving baseball.
They already follow their teams through losing seasons, disappointing finishes and years when the promise of October never becomes reality.
That is part of the competition. Wondering whether the season itself will be disrupted is a different kind of frustration.
The fan’s loyalty to their teams, the games, deserves consideration not an assumption that it will survive anything.
Don’t miss a headline, rumor and more subscribe to Nats Report+ Alerts to get the latest right to your broswer!
Subscribe to Nats Report Alerts
With the World Series decided, the conversation should be turning toward familiar questions.Who needs another starting pitcher? Which prospect might break through? Which free agent could change a team’s outlook? What would it take to get back to October?
That is where baseball’s energy belongs. Fans should be debating roster moves and spring-training expectations not wondering whether a labor dispute will disrupt the 2027 season.
A successful year does not resolve the disagreements between players and owners. But it should give both sides a reason to recognize what is worth protecting.
Both will say they are acting for the good of baseball. Fans should judge that claim by what players and owners do not simply by what they say.
Think about the fan who travels to another city to follow a team, buys championship gear the morning after the final out or stays awake through extra innings because this might finally be the year
.Think about the parent planning a child’s first game or the family already talking about a spring-training trip.Those investments are financial, but they are also personal. Baseball becomes part of people’s lives because they make room for it, season after season. There is also an economic impact on the cities that have major league teams.
Neither side should take that for granted. The 2026 championship has been settled on the field.
Now players and owners need to reach an agreement that gives those fans a season to look forward to not a dispute to endure.
Everything that you need to know about the upcoming Major League Baseball’s coming lockout
Will there be an MLB baseball season in 2027? When does the current Collective Bargaining agreement end?
There will probably be at least a shortened MLB season in 2027, but no one knows for sure
The current collective bargaining agreement ends at 11:59 p.m. ET on December 1, 2026.
What is a lockout, exactly? Will there be Minor League Baseball during the lockout?
A lockout means that the owners of Major League Baseball teams have told players they cannot come to work.
Yes, there will be minor league baseball in 2027. Minor leaguers have their own collective bargaining agreement that is still in force.
Are the player union and MLB meeting regularly and who’s at the negotiating table?
According to media reports, both sides have been meeting almost every week since they started negotiating in earnest in May.
Major League Deputy commissioner Dan Halem is leading the negotiations for the owners and Bruce Meyer, the interim head of the Major League Baseball Players Union is representing the players.
What can and can’t happen during the lockout
Major League Baseball has some flexibility of what it permits and does not during the lockout. Most transactions between Major League Baseball teams and union players (players who are on a teams’ 40-man roster) is not allowed. Signings, wavier claims, extentions can not involve Major league players.
Teams are also prohibited to talking to big leaguers or their agents about future deals for when the lockout ends.
What’s the cap and floor Major League Baseball is proposing?
According to media reports, Major League baseball wants teams to be limited to a $245.3 million payroll in 2027 with a minimum floor amount of $154.1 million.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Richard is the owner, head writer, and editor of the Nats Report. He has been a dedicated follower of the Washington Nationals since arriving in Washington, D.C., in 2005.